with the body or the soul, nor does he maintain that the “person of soul” is either mindless or fleshless; rather, he applies the name according to which tendency predominates in a person’s moral choices. Those who “discern all things and … are themselves subject to no one else’s scrutiny” are both enfleshed and ensouled but are still called “persons of spirit.”450 A man who, maddened by the passion of the flesh, violates his father’s bed451 is neither “soulless” nor deprived of reason. On the same